I stumbled past a local news broadcast last night involving a women who had dropped her baby during an alcohol related incident. Aside from the information that one could drop off their baby for five days with no questions asked somewhere, what stuck me were the comments of the seventeen year old witness. Citing her account of the awful event off camera, she said the mother was basically a good person, but unless or until she attended some parenting classes or alcoholic anonymous she probably should wait to get the baby back. 
Now it may be that the mother is overwhelmed or unsuited for the job. Certainly it was a bad situation. The length of the report and the sensationalism of flashing a baby's bloody head on screen over and over again is questionable. A lot a people may in fact identify with a similar situation that did not involve a 9-11 call and news report. But when a seventeen year old witness starts calling for classes for the errant mother, is it any wonder that certain college presidents are calling for a lowering of the drinking age ? At what point is the line crossed from childhood to adult ? While the state prohibits certain behavior, it also encourages opposite behaviors during a control freak bout of insistence and cool reassurance.
I would submit that biological age is not sufficient anymore and that a certification should be given to the presumptuous thirteen year old or the bumbling twenty-nine year old. Of course that range can be adjusted as we get data about the implementation and suitability of the test.







